Retrieves all Google Search Analytics dimensions—query, page, country, device, date, searchAppearance, hour—and explains what each represents for SEO analysis.
List every Search Analytics dimension (query, page, country, device, date, searchAppearance, hour) with what it means.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so safety behavior is fully covered. The description adds that each dimension is returned with an explanation, but does not add other behavioral context such as whether the list is static or dynamic.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
It is a single front-loaded sentence that enumerates the key return items without waste. Nothing is repeated unnecessarily and the purpose is immediately clear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given a zero-parameter read-only tool with rich annotations and an output schema, the description is largely complete. It could be improved by noting its relationship to list_available_metrics, but nothing needed to invoke it correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool takes zero parameters, so there are no parameter semantics for the description to clarify. Baseline 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
It states a specific verb ('List') and resource ('Search Analytics dimension') and enumerates the dimensions returned, making the tool's function unambiguous. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from the sibling list_available_metrics, but the domain term 'dimension' does most of the work.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for discovering available dimensions and their meanings, but it gives no explicit when-to-use guidance, exclusions, or alternative tools. An agent must infer that this is the discovery counterpart to list_available_metrics.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.