ci-triage-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ci-triage-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that pushes GitHub Actions CI/CD results and PR events into Claude Code sessions, enabling automatic investigation and remediation.3 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude live access to your GitHub workspace — PR reviews, issue triaging, repo search, and weekly digest reports through natural language.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets Claude Code manage GitHub issues, branches, and pull requests through natural language, automating the full development workflow from planning to closing.523 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that spawns autonomous Claude Code agents in GitHub repos, enabling task delegation with persistent state, multi-step workflows, and job monitoring.4779 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server providing RAG context and failure capture for Claude Code, enabling semantic search across project knowledge and storing/analyzing failures.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for GitHub Actions CI failure triage. It wraps the gh CLI to fetch PR checks, failed jobs, and tail/grep failed job logs with ANSI/timestamp stripping and root-cause extraction.5MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a distinct role in the triage pipeline: fetching runs, extracting signals, finding history, recording notes, and publishing. The convenience tool 'triage_pipeline_failure' overlaps with the granular tools but its description clearly positions it as a chaining wrapper, so misselection is unlikely.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: fetch_pipeline_run, extract_failure_signal, find_similar_past_failures, record_triage_note, triage_pipeline_failure, publish_triage. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.
Six tools is well-scoped for a CI triage server. Each tool covers a necessary step in the workflow without redundancy, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range.
The toolset covers the full triage cycle: fetch, extract, lookup, record, and publish. Minor gaps include no update/delete for history notes and no tool to configure allowed repos, but these are config/support concerns rather than core workflow gaps.