Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ci-triage-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude live access to your GitHub workspace — PR reviews, issue triaging, repo search, and weekly digest reports through natural language.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets Claude Code manage GitHub issues, branches, and pull requests through natural language, automating the full development workflow from planning to closing.
      523 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that spawns autonomous Claude Code agents in GitHub repos, enabling task delegation with persistent state, multi-step workflows, and job monitoring.
      47
      79 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing RAG context and failure capture for Claude Code, enabling semantic search across project knowledge and storing/analyzing failures.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct role in the triage pipeline: fetching runs, extracting signals, finding history, recording notes, and publishing. The convenience tool 'triage_pipeline_failure' overlaps with the granular tools but its description clearly positions it as a chaining wrapper, so misselection is unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: fetch_pipeline_run, extract_failure_signal, find_similar_past_failures, record_triage_note, triage_pipeline_failure, publish_triage. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a CI triage server. Each tool covers a necessary step in the workflow without redundancy, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the full triage cycle: fetch, extract, lookup, record, and publish. Minor gaps include no update/delete for history notes and no tool to configure allowed repos, but these are config/support concerns rather than core workflow gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues