Skip to main content
Glama
kridaydave

File Organizer MCP

by kridaydave

Related Servers

Alternatives to File Organizer MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first MCP server for safely searching, reading, summarizing, tagging, deduplicating, and organizing local files with scoped access, read-only defaults, and dry-run plans.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Comprehensive MCP server for filesystem operations, process management, interactive sessions, and async file search. Includes utilities for JSON repair, encoding fixes, duplicate detection, OCR, ZIP archives, and Markdown export.
      6
      46
      274 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A full-featured secure MCP server for local file system operations, with built-in image processing, OCR and media tools. Fully compliant with the official Model Context Protocol specification, offering standardized request/response schemas, large-file streaming I/O, multi-transport remote deployment, and comprehensive text search & replace functionality for LLM agent integration.
      22
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that bridges Claude Code to Google Antigravity's CLI, enabling Claude to orchestrate Gemini workers in parallel for reading, writing, verifying, and autonomous tasks. It provides tools for single dispatch, parallel fan-out, background jobs, and handles permission, cwd, and shell pitfalls.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is significant overlap among tools, e.g., organize_files vs organize_smart vs organize_by_content vs system_organize, and find_duplicate_files vs analyze_duplicates. Descriptions help differentiate them, but an agent could easily pick the wrong one for a given task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 26 tools follow the consistent 'file_organizer_verb_noun' pattern, with clear verbs like list, scan, organize, read, watch. This is highly predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 26 tools, the server is slightly above the 15-25 range. The broad feature set (organizing, watching, metadata, history) justifies many tools, but the count feels bloated, especially with overlapping functions that could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers listing, scanning, categorization, duplicate detection, multiple organization strategies, preview, history, watching, renaming, and metadata inspection. Missing direct file deletion (except duplicates) and file editing, but those are outside the organizer's scope. Overall coverage is strong with minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow