Perspective API Alternative (Toxicity Detection)
Related Servers
Alternatives to Perspective API Alternative (Toxicity Detection)
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides advanced evaluation tools for assessing AI safety, alignment, and performance of LLM outputs. Enables programmatic evaluation of quality, safety metrics like toxicity and PII detection, and operational metrics including carbon footprint and cost estimation.4Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceContent moderation and profanity detection MCP server with 19 tools, 24 language support, leetspeak/Unicode obfuscation detection, context-aware analysis, batch processing, and user tracking for AI-powered content safety.12 npm65MIT
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA model-agnostic MCP server exposing example tools (add1, multiply2, greet) for learning purposes, working with any LLM through stdio transport.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceExposes a verified tool registry (calculator, sandboxed file read, web fetch) over MCP stdio, enabling any MCP-capable client to reuse the same tools from the inspectable ReAct loop.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConfigurable MCP server that lets you define LLM-powered tools via JSON, enabling easy integration of multiple models (GPT, Gemini, Claude, etc.) as MCP tools without writing Python code.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA minimal MCP server with four tools (add, greet, text_stats, divide) demonstrating typed parameters, structured outputs, and error handling over stdio transport.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA learning-oriented MCP server that exposes basic tools (echo, add, reverse) over stdio transport to validate MCP handshake and tool calls.3-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceThis MCP server is a zero-config CLI tool that lets developers tap into any stdio-based MCP server from their terminal, enabling them to list tools/resources/prompts, call tools with JSON arguments, and health-check servers without requiring a full AI client or browser setup.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of misselection or overlap with a sibling tool. The single tool's purpose (toxicity scoring) is unambiguous and clearly stated.
The lone name 'analyze_toxicity' follows a clean verb_noun snake_case convention. With a single tool there is no opportunity for inconsistent conventions.
A single tool is defensible for a narrow API wrapper, and batching up to 100 texts per call covers the main use case. However, one tool is the thinnest possible surface, leaving no separate operations for things like model/attribute discovery or quota checks.
The scoring operation itself is complete: multi-attribute probabilities, batching, and clear read-only semantics cover the moderation workflow. Minor gaps exist around attribute/language enumeration and rate-limit or quota visibility, but agents can work around these.