Skip to main content
Glama
kouui

DuckDuckGo Web Search MCP Server

by kouui
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to DuckDuckGo Web Search MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • web-search-cli

      AusertDream
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web search using Bing and DuckDuckGo combined, and fetching readable content from web pages, with no API key required.
      9 npm
      2
      MIT

    • DuckDuckGo MCP Server

      988664li-star
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web search through DuckDuckGo and webpage content fetching with intelligent text extraction. Features built-in rate limiting and LLM-optimized result formatting for seamless integration with language models.
      2
      MIT

    • Web Search MCP

      pranavms13
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web searching through Google, DuckDuckGo, and Bing using a headless Chrome browser, returning structured results with titles, URLs, and snippets. Also supports fetching and extracting text content from any webpage.
      14
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The two tools have distinct primary purposes: 'search_and_fetch' performs web searches and returns results, while 'fetch' scrapes HTML content from a given URL. However, there is some potential for confusion because 'fetch' accepts a 'url' argument but its description mentions 'search query string' (likely a documentation error), which could blur the boundary between searching and fetching.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tool names follow a consistent verb-based pattern ('fetch' and 'search_and_fetch'), with clear action-oriented naming. The minor deviation is that 'search_and_fetch' uses an 'and' conjunction, but overall the naming is readable and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a web search and scraping domain. While it covers basic search and fetch operations, more tools (e.g., for advanced search filtering, caching, or handling different content types) would provide better scope. It's borderline but not severely lacking.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers core web search and content fetching workflows, but there are notable gaps. For example, it lacks tools for managing search history, refining queries, handling pagination, or supporting different output formats beyond markdown. Agents can work around these, but the surface is not fully comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources