A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceLocal MCP server for Claude Code providing persistent memory, task planning, and agent coordination with full transparency and no network calls.
2
MIT
coding-os
by kouroshez
Related Servers
Alternatives to coding-os
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA 68-tool MCP server providing persistent memory, error tracking, decision logging, task orchestration, and multi-modal AI generation for coding agents like OpenCode and Claude Code.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for sharing source-backed engineering memory across AI coding clients like Cursor and VS Code.301MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for orchestrating coding tasks with frontier-model planning and local execution, enabling manifest validation, plan submission, status checks, cancellation, and report retrieval through Claude Code.6MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that exposes local agents as tools for Claude Code, enabling capabilities in quant, trading, news, reports, robotics, Notion, and FreeCAD.13 npm1-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server enables remote control and management of Claude Code agents, allowing you to execute missions, configure agent personalities, and integrate with other MCP tools.79 npm1MIT
TDQS
B3/5.0
Scored across 87 tools
Disambiguation3/5
The tools are grouped by domain with detailed descriptions that explicitly steer usage, but the sheer number of overlapping graph, search, and supervision tools creates real ambiguity. Pairs like cos_graph_diff/cos_graph_detect_changes, cos_graph_query/cos_graph_resolve, and cos_task_reclaim/cos_task_reconcile require careful reading to avoid misselection.
Naming Consistency3/5
All tools share the cos_ prefix and use snake_case, and domain prefixes like graph_, task_, and doc_ provide useful structure. However, the suffix pattern is mixed: some names are verb-oriented (cos_graph_query, cos_task_create), some are noun-oriented (cos_graph_cycles, cos_graph_doctor), and some use inconsistent word order (cos_work_log_append, cos_digest_regenerate).
Tool Count1/5
87 tools is an extreme count for any MCP server surface and far exceeds the typical well-scoped 3-15 tool range. Even with broad 'coding OS' ambitions, this volume will create significant selection overhead and cognitive load for agents.
Completeness4/5
The set provides unusually deep coverage across task lifecycle, graph analysis, memory, retrieval feedback, metrics, supervision, and trajectory tracking. Minor gaps exist—such as no explicit task archive/delete, no doc write/update tool, and cos_promote returning content without writing it—but most are workaroundable or outside the server's apparent read/analyze focus.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week