@kooperativa_team/mcp-server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to @kooperativa_team/mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search B2B people and companies, enrich contacts with verified emails and mobile phone numbers via waterfall enrichment across 25+ providers, and export results as CSV or JSON. Supports prospecting, org mapping, candidate sourcing, and outreach workflows through OAuth-authenticated remote access from any MCP-compatible client.10MIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceGive your AI agent access to 60M+ companies and 300M+ verified contacts. Enrich leads, find work emails, discover tech stacks, and identify buying intent — directly from Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, or any MCP-compatible AI agent.1119 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to size audiences, search for B2B people by role, company, industry, and location, and enrich contacts with verified work emails and mobile numbers inside MCP clients such as Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor.MIT

DataForB2B MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAllows searching and enriching companies, people, job postings, and social posts via the DataForB2B API, bringing lead generation and market intelligence into MCP-compatible clients like Cursor and Claude.6MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover and enrich real-time B2B company data, including contact details, ratings, websites, and emails, through MCP-compatible clients.580 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching over 1 million enriched job listings from 20,000+ companies directly from MCP-compatible AI tools. Provides tools for job search, company profiles, and AI-powered similar job recommendations with real-time data updates.476 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct role: account/license checks, health probe, person/company lookup/search/check, relationship and signal queries, and monitor lifecycle. Even similar tools like check_person vs enrich_person are explicitly differentiated as cheap existence check vs full profile fetch.
The shared kooperativa_ prefix and snake_case make the set easy to navigate, and action verbs like search, check, enrich, create, and delete are used consistently. Minor deviations exist where resource-first names are used (person_colleagues, company_current_employees, company_hiring_signals), but they still follow an obvious and predictable pattern.
Nineteen tools is on the heavier side, but the count is justified by the server's breadth: people, companies, signals, account utilities, and webhook monitoring. Each tool maps to a distinct operation and none feel redundant.
The surface covers the core workflow well: check existence, search, enrich single/bulk, and related people/company insights, plus monitor create/list/delete. The only notable gap is the lack of an update_monitor endpoint, but this can be worked around with delete and recreate.