clef-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to clef-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceExposes a single decide tool that sends caller-supplied choice, score, noul, and box questions to any System One typed-decision endpoint, returning structured answers, probabilities, and confidence. It tolerates responses that omit usage.output_tokens, so providers such as Bailian's decision-model-preview work instead of failing with INVALID_RESPONSE.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables structured yes/no, multiple-choice, and ordered-score judgments from supplied text and criteria, returning typed probabilities, selected labels, scores, and confidence. It exposes bounded decision tools without search, chat generation, arbitrary HTTP requests, or action execution.234 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to make fast, zero-output-token decisions by evaluating context, diffs, logs, or options through the OpenRouter Decisions API using TypeSafe Jev, returning calibrated probabilities for binary, categorical, or scoring questions.123 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to request calibrated probability judgments over typed questions—yes/no, named choices, or ordered scores—about a described situation, returning one probability per option rather than free text. Runs Cloudflare's Clef model locally on Apple Silicon Macs, with images or video frames optionally attached, and answers delivered as a single MCP tool call.183 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides agents with fast, typed, calibrated decision tools for classification, scoring, yes/no checks, and gating risky tool calls.5234 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides coding agents with typed classification, yes/no checks, scoring, ranking, and question-answering tools that return calibrated probabilities for fast, reliable decisions.686 npm58MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
There is only one tool, so there is nothing to confuse it with. Within the tool, the three question types (choice, noul, score) are clearly delineated with distinct criteria and answer shapes, so an agent can select the right mode without ambiguity.
A single, clear verb name ('decide') that accurately reflects the operation. There are no competing conventions to clash, and the naming reads naturally for the domain.
The server exposes exactly one tool, which is thin by the usual 3-15 guidance, though it is a genuinely single-capability wrapper around a decision model and the batch 'questions' parameter absorbs what would otherwise be many tools. It is borderline rather than mismatched, since no second capability obviously belongs here.
The tool covers the core decision surface well: batch questions, three answer modes, optional images, and probability outputs for thresholding. Minor gaps remain, such as model discovery/selection, health or capability introspection, and any guidance on limits or failure modes, which an agent would have to work around.