@konsulto/mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to @konsulto/mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server that wraps the headless Claude Code CLI as MCP tools, providing stateless access to Claude's coding capabilities through prompt-based interactions. It enables users to execute Claude Code commands with various prompt formats and structured outputs directly from MCP clients.3MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server for the OnSecurity API that allows Claude to query Rounds, Findings, Prerequisites, Blocks and Notifications.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server connects Claude Desktop to a Velociraptor instance and local forensic tools. It enables remote endpoint investigation and local evidence analysis through natural language commands.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server orchestrating local CLI agents (Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Google Gemini) for cross-validation, second opinions, and persona-driven prompting.18MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for managing Claude Code conversation sessions1268 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that routes Claude Desktop chat into Claude Code, enabling headless execution and terminal handoff with session continuity.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose. Overlaps like append_to_section and replace_section are differentiated by operation type, and search vs get findings serve different needs. No ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent 'konsulto_verb_noun' pattern. Verbs are action-specific (add, append, attach, compose, create, etc.) and nouns target distinct entities, making names predictable and easy to navigate.
19 tools cover the core workflows of a security audit MCP server—finding management, evidence, assets, templates, and audit context. The count is well-scoped, each tool earning its place without bloat.
The tool surface is comprehensive for the stated purpose, covering creating, reading, updating, and searching findings, evidence lifecycle, asset management, and audit orientation. The only notable gap is the absence of deletion operations (findings, assets, etc.), which may be intentional but slightly reduces completeness.