Skip to main content
Glama
kof70
by kof70

Related Servers

Alternatives to Coolify MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to manage a self-hosted Coolify instance, including applications, databases, services, servers, projects, deployments, environment variables, tags, teams, private keys, and S3 backup storages via the Coolify REST API.
      211 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables management of Coolify instances to control applications, databases, and servers through the Model Context Protocol. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for deploying services and monitoring self-hosted infrastructure using natural language.
      18
      8 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Coolify for complete infrastructure management including applications, databases, servers, deployments, and team operations. Provides 100% API coverage with 64 tools for managing the entire Coolify ecosystem through natural language.
      18
      7 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Coolify self-hosted instances for application deployment, management, and monitoring. Features 4 unified tools optimized for VS Code's limits, covering app management, environment configuration, system administration, and built-in documentation.
      4
      211 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Coolify infrastructure including servers, applications, databases, deployments, and 80+ one-click services through 98 comprehensive tools for both cloud and self-hosted instances.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 89 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between deploy and deploy_application, and multiple create_application methods could cause ambiguity. Overall, the descriptions help differentiate.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use consistent verb_noun snake_case naming (e.g., create_application, delete_server, list_projects). The pattern is uniform and predictable, with only minor exceptions like health_check.

    Tool Count2/5

    89 tools is excessively large for a single MCP server. While the domain is broad, many tools could be consolidated or parameterized. The count far exceeds typical coherence standards.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides full CRUD and lifecycle operations for most resources (applications, databases, services, servers, etc.). However, some endpoints are unavailable (execute_command, database/service logs) and domain management is incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues