A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server for querying OpenAI usage and cost data, including spend summaries, daily breakdowns, month-over-month comparisons, and token usage by model.
3
MIT
Cost Management MCP
by knishioka
Related Servers
Alternatives to Cost Management MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA read-only MCP server for querying AI provider administration APIs, providing normalized usage, cost, and dashboard data for OpenAI and Anthropic.48 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceCloud cost management MCP server for Azure. Ask your AI about your cloud bill.1529 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for generating upfront AWS service cost estimates and providing cost insights.5Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for tracking and managing costs per AI agent, with budget alerts, anomaly detection, and model cost comparison.25 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first FinOps MCP server. Ask about your AWS, Azure, GCP, and SaaS costs in plain English. Anomaly detection, rightsizing, idle-resource cleanup, and Jira/Linear ticketing. Credentials never leave your machine.1017Apache 2.0
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation3/5
There is significant overlap between tools, particularly 'cost_breakdown', 'cost_get', 'cost_periods', and 'cost_trends', which all seem to retrieve and analyze cost data with subtle distinctions. However, provider-specific tools like 'anthropic_costs' and 'openai_costs' are clearly distinct, and descriptions help differentiate some overlaps, preventing complete confusion.
Naming Consistency4/5
The naming follows a consistent snake_case pattern throughout, with most tools using a clear 'provider_action' or 'cost_action' structure. Minor deviations exist, such as 'cost_get' using a generic verb while others like 'cost_breakdown' are more descriptive, but overall the naming is predictable and readable.
Tool Count5/5
With 10 tools, the count is well-scoped for a cost management server covering multiple providers and analysis dimensions. Each tool appears to serve a specific purpose, such as provider-specific costs, comparisons, and trend analysis, making the set comprehensive without being overwhelming.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers core cost management workflows, including retrieving costs by provider, comparing providers and periods, analyzing trends, and checking balances. Minor gaps might include operations for setting budgets or configuring providers, but agents can likely work around these with the available tools for monitoring and analysis.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessUnresponsive