mcp-analytics-stub
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-analytics-stub
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to discover and execute operational tools such as database mutations and system diagnostics over stdio, with deterministic structured outputs and Langfuse observability.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-aware clients to query and use the you-design catalog of design systems, skills, and plugins at runtime via stdio.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes three read-only tools over stdio — guarded SQL querying, SKU status lookup, and document retrieval — plus a schema resource. This lets MCP clients such as Claude Code answer stock and policy questions without any write access.MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceProvides a stdio MCP server with strict input validation and JSON-RPC error handling for tool calls.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Cursor and Claude Desktop to query a GRC platform over stdio or HTTP, with read-only access by default and opt-in create, update, and delete tools subject to platform authorization.2Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides two MCP tools for querying a synthetic marketing SQLite database and running agent evaluation cases, with read-only SQL guarding and deterministic planning. The server communicates over stdio and supports initialization handshake and tool listing.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
resolve_category and get_insights target clearly different stages of the workflow (discovery vs. retrieval), and the descriptions explicitly explain the handoff via category ids. There is no overlap that could cause misselection.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern. The convention is applied uniformly with no mixed styles or casing deviations.
Two tools is thin but the stub scope (resolve a category, fetch its insights) is plausibly minimal. It sits at the borderline where an agent may need more surface for real work.
Coverage is a narrow two-step path: discovery requires a query string with no way to list all categories, and there is no pagination, time range, or drill-down beyond 'top insights'. Core workflow works but obvious gaps remain.