Skip to main content
Glama
kmsmohamedansar

mcp-analytics-stub

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-analytics-stub

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-aware clients to query and use the you-design catalog of design systems, skills, and plugins at runtime via stdio.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes three read-only tools over stdio — guarded SQL querying, SKU status lookup, and document retrieval — plus a schema resource. This lets MCP clients such as Claude Code answer stock and policy questions without any write access.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a stdio MCP server with strict input validation and JSON-RPC error handling for tool calls.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Cursor and Claude Desktop to query a GRC platform over stdio or HTTP, with read-only access by default and opt-in create, update, and delete tools subject to platform authorization.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides two MCP tools for querying a synthetic marketing SQLite database and running agent evaluation cases, with read-only SQL guarding and deterministic planning. The server communicates over stdio and supports initialization handshake and tool listing.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    resolve_category and get_insights target clearly different stages of the workflow (discovery vs. retrieval), and the descriptions explicitly explain the handoff via category ids. There is no overlap that could cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern. The convention is applied uniformly with no mixed styles or casing deviations.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is thin but the stub scope (resolve a category, fetch its insights) is plausibly minimal. It sits at the borderline where an agent may need more surface for real work.

    Completeness3/5

    Coverage is a narrow two-step path: discovery requires a query string with no way to list all categories, and there is no pagination, time range, or drill-down beyond 'top insights'. Core workflow works but obvious gaps remain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues