Skip to main content
Glama
kleinicke

3D Visualizer

Related Servers

Alternatives to 3D Visualizer

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to inspect and measure native B-rep geometry, create and edit CAD models, export results, and optionally review models or prepare print jobs locally.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop or Claude Code to inspect, visualize, and process point clouds and meshes in natural language, with tools for metadata, density, subsampling, registration, distance computation, normals, filtering, merging, and format conversion. Tuned for cave, tunnel, and underground 3D surveys, it can run batch command-line operations without requiring an open GUI.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to create, inspect, edit, and export bounded synthetic 3D Slicer volumes, phantoms, and sphere meshes, configure cameras and orthogonal slices, and render PNG previews via MCP. It also supports native MRB scene round-tripping and NRRD/STL artifact export within a trusted local workspace.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables scientific data introspection and visualization of VTK datasets with format-adaptive metadata extraction and interactive 3D visualization through MCP tools.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to visually inspect and diagnose 3D files (meshes and Gaussian splats) for defects like flipped normals or floaters, without GPU dependencies.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools occupy near-adjacent roles: set_3d_camera vs navigate_3d_view for camera control, capture_3d_view vs preview_3d_views for image inspection, and manage_3d_views vs manage_3d_scene_states for saved state. The long descriptions help, but an agent must carefully compare multiple tools before selection. The app-only transport tools (submit_viewer_reply, read_viewer_data) also blur the boundary between domain actions and internal communication.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming is generally very consistent: snake_case verb-first names such as open_3d_files, set_3d_camera, and manage_3d_scene_states create a clear pattern. Minor divergences like open_depth_image, visualize_points, submit_viewer_reply, and read_viewer_data do not use the same 3d marker, but the overall verb_noun convention remains predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 27 tools, the surface is too large; only a handful of related verbs are needed for the core workflows. Many tools could be grouped or filtered into a smaller, more focused set. The breadth may be useful, but the agent-facing tool count creates too much decision overhead.

    Completeness4/5

    The domain is broadly covered: opening local, remote, and depth data; inspecting, updating, closing, transforming, aligning, measuring, selecting, exporting, comparing, and animating scenes. Minor gaps include lack of explicit per-object deletion and a couple of internal app-only transport tools that do not fit the domain surface.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive