Skip to main content
Glama
kk-kd

temporal-mcp

by kk-kd
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to temporal-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • hatchet-mcp

      DanMeon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Hatchet, the durable orchestration engine, enabling LLMs to inspect workflow definitions, runs, logs, and more, with optional mutating tools for triggering, canceling, and managing workflows.
      217 PyPI
      MIT

    • runmeter

      Aptica-Solutions
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides cost and reliability observability for LLM and agent workflows. It records model calls and allows querying and aggregating telemetry data through MCP tools.
      6
      MIT

    • otel-mcp

      moondef
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents access to your application's OpenTelemetry traces for querying, analysis, and debugging.
      5
      13 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of workflow inspection: list_workflows returns filtered overviews, describe_workflow provides detailed state for a specific execution, and get_workflow_history returns the event sequence. There is no meaningful overlap between the tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase verb_noun pattern: list_workflows, describe_workflow, get_workflow_history. The naming style is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools form a focused read-only workflow inspection surface for Temporal. Each tool earns its place, and the count is well-scoped for the apparent purpose.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers core inspection operations well, but it lacks common workflow management operations such as start, signal, terminate, or query. For a read-only observability server this would be complete, but for a general temporal-mcp toolset it has notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources