Skip to main content
Glama
kitfoxs

HumanizeMCP

by kitfoxs
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to HumanizeMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • being-human

      Syedomershah99
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that analyzes your writing style to generate personal voice rules, scores drafts for AI slop, and verifies authorship, enabling LLMs to write in your specific voice.
      7
      MIT

    • Humanizer PRO

      khadinakbaronline
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Humanizer PRO - The Best AI Text Humanizer MCP Server Transform AI-generated content into natural, human-sounding text that bypasses GPTZero, Turnitin, Originality.ai, Copyleaks, ZeroGPT, and other AI detectors. Undetectable AI content rewriting with Stealth, Academic, and SEO modes.
      3
      -

    • slop-cop

      0ju1c3
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Detects and fixes LLM prose patterns in text, exposing tools for auditing and improving writing quality in MCP-compatible hosts.
      11 npm
      2
      MIT

    • brandvoice-mcp

      jsliapark
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that learns your writing style and helps AI assistants emulate your voice by ingesting samples, storing style profiles, and providing context for content generation.
      8
      MIT

    • my-voice-mcp

      timetoady
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that builds compact voice profiles from writing samples, then compares, rewrites, or generates new text in that voice.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct: detect_tells, score_humanity, apply_style, and list_styles each serve unique purposes. The only potential confusion is between humanize and humanize_and_verify, but their descriptions clearly delineate the simple pipeline from the iterative verification loop, so agents should be able to choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: humanize, detect_tells, score_humanity, apply_style, list_styles, humanize_and_verify. Even the compound name follows the convention. No mixing of styles or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a text humanization server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect: core humanization, diagnostic analysis, scoring, style control, and verification loop. This is an appropriate size without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset provides complete coverage of the humanization workflow: humanize for direct rewriting, humanize_and_verify for iterative improvement, detect_tells for diagnostics, score_humanity for evaluation, and apply_style/list_styles for style manipulation. There are no obvious gaps in the lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources