Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to codex-local-ollama-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible applications to access local and cloud LLM model management, text generation, chat, embeddings, and web search/fetch through Ollama SDK tools.
      689 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes the complete Ollama SDK as MCP tools, enabling MCP-compatible applications to manage and run local or cloud models, generate text, chat, create embeddings, and use web search/fetch.
      689 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to interact with local and cloud Ollama models by exposing Ollama SDK functionality as tools for model management, text generation, chat, embeddings, and web search/fetch.
      689 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes the complete Ollama SDK as MCP tools, enabling MCP-compatible applications to manage local and cloud models, chat and generate text, create embeddings, and perform web search and fetch.
      689 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable assistants such as Codex and Claude to delegate bounded text work — summaries, structured extraction, classification, rewrites, code drafts and log digestion — to locally hosted Ollama models, with conservative routing that keeps small or sensitive tasks with the caller and private-result artifacts for sensitive output.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of confusing it with others. The tool's purpose is clearly limited to creating a labeled local draft from user text.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    With a single tool, there are no naming inconsistencies to flag. However, the name 'local_text' does not follow a clear verb_noun pattern, making it impossible to infer a broader convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    A single tool is far too few for a server with a broad name like 'codex-local-ollama-mcp'. The tool itself appears limited and trivial relative to the implied scope, creating an extreme mismatch.

    Completeness1/5

    The server offers only one narrow operation, with no apparent CRUD lifecycle, retrieval, or management capabilities. The domain hinted by the server name is severely underrepresented, leaving agents without essential functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues