Skip to main content
Glama
kirvigen

notion-private-api-mcp

by kirvigen

Related Servers

Alternatives to notion-private-api-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Full-featured Notion MCP server enabling deep page reading, block editing, snapshot/restore, file uploads, table manipulation, page restore, and destructive page copying.
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server that exposes your local Notion backups to AI agents — query databases, read pages, search a backed-up workspace. Offline by default: no LLM calls, no telemetry, no cloud.
      6
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Remote MCP server that exposes Notion as tools (search, get, create pages, append blocks, query databases) via Streamable HTTP with bearer auth, designed for deployment on Railway.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for the Notion API, enabling AI agents to read, write, and manage Notion pages and databases. This fork restores database creation support.
      127 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: page vs block CRUD, content replacement, style documentation, and markdown conversion. No meaningful overlap exists between any two tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_page, delete_blocks). However, markdown_to_blocks deviates by using a descriptor format, breaking the uniform convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set covers core Notion page and block operations, plus supporting utilities. The count is well-scoped for the private API's capabilities without being excessive.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers basic content creation, reading, and modification, but lacks page metadata updates, page deletion, and search. These gaps may hinder some workflows but core content operations are present.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues