list-launches

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior but only states basic purpose. It does not mention pagination (though 'page' and 'size' params exist), result ordering, auth requirements, or whether it lists all launches or filtered ones.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short sentence, which is concise but too sparse to be helpful. It front-loads the purpose but lacks necessary detail. Every sentence should earn its place; here, the sentence is minimal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Without output schema, return values are unexplained. The description does not cover pagination behavior, required fields beyond projectId, or any additional context needed for correct usage. The tool is underspecified for its complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is low (33%) and the tool description adds no meaning to the parameters. 'page' and 'size' are unexplained, and 'projectId' is only described in the schema. The description should clarify these parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List') and resource ('test launches') with scope ('in a project'). It distinguishes from siblings like 'get-launch' (singular) and 'list-test-results' (different resource).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, when not to use, or comparative context with siblings like 'get-launch'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.