Skip to main content
Glama
kira4094

DeepSeek Subagent MCP Server

by kira4094
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to DeepSeek Subagent MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • deepseek-subagent-mcp

      gaztrabisme
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents like Claude Code or Codex to delegate tasks to a DeepSeek Harness subagent with its own context window, providing tools for task delegation, result waiting, continuation, and supervision with sandboxed execution.
      6
      MIT

    • dsh-codex-bridge

      SgfKrc
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Codex and DSH to invoke DeepSeek subagents for inspect, plan, review, and implement tasks, with write protection, rollback, and status reporting.
      15 npm
      MIT

    • deepseek-mcp

      arizen-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables using DeepSeek models as a small, cheap supervised worker from any MCP-compatible client, providing fast flash and deep reasoning tools for bounded tasks.
      2
      53
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusion or overlapping purposes. The tool clearly covers the single action of delegating a sub-task to DeepSeek.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With a single tool, there is no pattern to be inconsistent about. The name 'deepseek_task' is descriptive and follows a clear noun-based naming convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is on the thin side; while the server's purpose is narrow, a richer integration might include multiple tools (e.g., different task types or configuration options). The count is borderline but not unreasonable for a single-purpose sub-agent server.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool fully covers the stated purpose of delegating a self-contained task and returning the result. Minor gaps exist, such as no way to manage task history or configure multiple output modes, but these are not essential to the core workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources