Skip to main content
Glama
kinhunt

twitterapi-mcp

by kinhunt

Related Servers

Alternatives to twitterapi-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol server that enables programmatic interaction with Twitter API, allowing users to post tweets, search for content, and retrieve user timelines through standardized MCP tools.
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides access to Twitter data and write actions through TwitterAPI.io, bypassing the need for a standard Twitter developer account. It enables users to search tweets, retrieve profiles, and post content with support for pagination and enterprise proxy configurations.
      11 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An enhanced Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude to interact with Twitter/X, supporting tweet posting, searching, and deletion with both OAuth 1.0a and OAuth 2.0 authentication methods.
      46 npm
      21
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables Claude to interact with Twitter, allowing for posting tweets and searching Twitter content.
      2
      282 npm
      407
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool maps to a distinct resource and action: user lookup by username/ID, tweet fetching by user/ID/search/replies, follower/following lists, and auth/write. No two tools overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_, search_, login_, create_). The naming convention is uniform and predictable across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a Twitter API server covering basic reads, search, and a minimal write path. Each tool has a clear purpose and the count fits comfortably in the ideal range.

    Completeness3/5

    The read side is well covered (user, tweets, followers, search), and create_tweet provides a write entry point. However, there are notable missing operations such as delete/update tweet, follow/unfollow, or like/retweet, leaving the write surface incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues