twitterapi-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to twitterapi-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server that enables programmatic interaction with Twitter API, allowing users to post tweets, search for content, and retrieve user timelines through standardized MCP tools.7 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to Twitter data and write actions through TwitterAPI.io, bypassing the need for a standard Twitter developer account. It enables users to search tweets, retrieve profiles, and post content with support for pagination and enterprise proxy configurations.11 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn enhanced Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude to interact with Twitter/X, supporting tweet posting, searching, and deletion with both OAuth 1.0a and OAuth 2.0 authentication methods.46 npm21MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables Claude to interact with Twitter, allowing for posting tweets and searching Twitter content.2282 npm407MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables Claude to automate Twitter posting with AI-generated images and thread support.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to interact with Twitter without direct API access, supporting tweet operations, user interactions, and Grok AI integration.141,373 npm32MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Every tool maps to a distinct resource and action: user lookup by username/ID, tweet fetching by user/ID/search/replies, follower/following lists, and auth/write. No two tools overlap in purpose.
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_, search_, login_, create_). The naming convention is uniform and predictable across the entire set.
With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped for a Twitter API server covering basic reads, search, and a minimal write path. Each tool has a clear purpose and the count fits comfortably in the ideal range.
The read side is well covered (user, tweets, followers, search), and create_tweet provides a write entry point. However, there are notable missing operations such as delete/update tweet, follow/unfollow, or like/retweet, leaving the write surface incomplete.