cost-of-work-index
Related Servers
Alternatives to cost-of-work-index
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceCalculates ROI, break-even, and cost projections for AI agents and automation projects, providing instant answers without external APIs.-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceParametric price benchmarking for engineering and procurement trade-offs. Agentic first, runs on your data, stays on your machine.8122-

eorscope-mcpofficial
FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables looking up statutory employer contributions by country, published Employer of Record provider fees, and combined all-in hiring costs for a given salary and headcount. Ships an offline snapshot of 76 countries and 14 providers, returning sourced figures with methodology and freshness metadata.5-- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenance160 tools that do that heavy lifting - storage, agent-to-agent collaboration, document conversions, identity verification -- almost all priced under a tenth of a cent or less per call.14MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceDeterministic Odoo ERP calculators: implementation, migration and upgrade cost, ROI and TCO, US/Canada/EU sales tax and VAT, Canadian payroll source deductions, and inventory maths (reorder point, safety stock, EOQ, landed cost, OEE). 24 tools, each a pure function, the numbers are arithmetic rather than a model's guess. Hosted remote server, no install and no API key; a stdio bridge is included24MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to evaluate business processes for automation by collecting discovery answers, calculating labor costs, scoring automation potential, and saving completed audits to a local SQLite database.8-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool serves a distinct function: enumerating tasks, fetching a specific cost, computing annual projections, listing sources, and dumping the whole dataset. There is no meaningful overlap; the only similar tools are list_work_tasks and get_cost_of_work_index, but the latter is explicitly for bulk retrieval while the former is a lightweight overview.
All names follow a consistent verb_noun structure with snake_case. The verbs list/get/estimate clearly signal the action, and the nouns match the resource (work_tasks, task_cost, annual_cost, sources, cost_of_work_index). No mixed conventions or vague verbs are present.
With 5 tools, the set is tightly scoped to the server's purpose of querying a cost index. Each tool covers a necessary operation without redundancy or bloat, making the count well-proportioned.
The server appears to be a read-only index, so the surface covers all natural usage patterns: discovering tasks, retrieving single costs, computing annual estimates, citing sources, and obtaining the full dataset. No obvious gaps exist for the intended domain.