Skip to main content
Glama

list_technologies

Read-only

Browse Apple technologies and frameworks by category, language, and beta status. Use filters to find frameworks for app development or to get identifiers for symbol search.

Instructions

Browse all Apple technologies and frameworks by category. Essential for discovering available frameworks and understanding Apple's technology ecosystem. Use this when: exploring what's available, finding framework identifiers for search_framework_symbols, checking beta status.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
categoryNoFilter by category (case-sensitive). Popular: "App frameworks" (SwiftUI, UIKit), "Graphics and games" (Metal, SpriteKit), "App services" (CloudKit, StoreKit), "Media" (AVFoundation), "System" (Foundation). Leave empty to see all categories.
languageNoFilter by language support. "swift" for Swift-compatible frameworks, "occ" for Objective-C. Leave empty for all.
includeBetaNoInclude beta/preview technologies. Set to false to see only stable frameworks. Default: true
limitNoMax results per category. Useful for quick overviews. Default: 200

Implementation Reference

  • Main handler function for list_technologies tool. Fetches technologies data from Apple's JSON endpoint, applies filters (category, language, includeBeta, limit), caches results, and returns a formatted markdown string.
    export async function handleListTechnologies(
      category?: string,
      language?: string,
      includeBeta: boolean = true,
      limit: number = API_LIMITS.DEFAULT_TECHNOLOGIES_LIMIT,
    ): Promise<string> {
      try {
        logger.info('Fetching technologies list...');
    
        // Generate cache key
        const cacheKey = generateUrlCacheKey('technologies', { category, language, includeBeta, limit });
    
        // Try to get from cache first
        const cachedResult = technologiesCache.get<string>(cacheKey);
        if (cachedResult) {
          logger.debug('Technologies cache hit');
          return cachedResult;
        }
    
        // 获取技术列表
        const data = await httpClient.getJson<TechnologiesData>(APPLE_URLS.TECHNOLOGIES_JSON);
    
        // 解析技术列表
        const technologies = parseTechnologies(data);
    
        // 应用过滤器
        const filteredTechnologies = applyTechnologyFilters(technologies, {
          category,
          language,
          includeBeta,
          limit,
        });
    
        // 格式化输出
        const result = formatTechnologiesList(filteredTechnologies);
    
        // Cache the result
        technologiesCache.set(cacheKey, result);
    
        return result;
    
      } catch (error) {
        const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
        return `Error: Failed to list technologies: ${errorMessage}`;
      }
    }
  • Zod schema defining input validation for listTechnologies: optional category string, optional language enum (swift/occ), includeBeta boolean (default true), and limit number (positive, max capped).
    export const listTechnologiesSchema = z.object({
      category: z.string().optional().describe('Filter by technology category'),
      language: z.enum(['swift', 'occ']).optional().describe('Filter by programming language'),
      includeBeta: z.boolean().default(true).describe('Include beta technologies'),
      limit: z.number().int().positive().max(API_LIMITS.MAX_TECHNOLOGIES_LIMIT).default(API_LIMITS.DEFAULT_TECHNOLOGIES_LIMIT).describe('Maximum number of technologies to return'),
    });
  • Tool definition registration with name 'list_technologies', description, inputSchema (JSON Schema) including category, language, includeBeta, limit parameters, and annotations.
    {
      name: 'list_technologies',
      description: 'Browse all Apple technologies and frameworks by category. Essential for discovering available frameworks and understanding Apple\'s technology ecosystem. Use this when: exploring what\'s available, finding framework identifiers for search_framework_symbols, checking beta status.',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          category: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'Filter by category (case-sensitive). Popular: "App frameworks" (SwiftUI, UIKit), "Graphics and games" (Metal, SpriteKit), "App services" (CloudKit, StoreKit), "Media" (AVFoundation), "System" (Foundation). Leave empty to see all categories.',
          },
          language: {
            type: 'string',
            enum: ['swift', 'occ'],
            description: 'Filter by language support. "swift" for Swift-compatible frameworks, "occ" for Objective-C. Leave empty for all.',
          },
          includeBeta: {
            type: 'boolean',
            description: 'Include beta/preview technologies. Set to false to see only stable frameworks. Default: true',
          },
          limit: {
            type: 'number',
            description: 'Max results per category. Useful for quick overviews. Default: 200',
          },
        },
        required: [],
      },
      annotations: {
        title: 'List Technologies',
        readOnlyHint: true,
      },
    },
  • Dispatcher in toolHandlers map that routes 'list_technologies' calls. Validates args via listTechnologiesSchema, then calls server.listTechnologies() which delegates to handleListTechnologies().
    list_technologies: async (args, server) => {
      const validatedArgs = listTechnologiesSchema.parse(args);
      return await server.listTechnologies(
        validatedArgs.category,
        validatedArgs.language,
        validatedArgs.includeBeta,
        validatedArgs.limit,
      );
    },
  • Cache warmer that pre-loads technologies data on startup by calling handleListTechnologies() with no filters and with popular categories to improve response times.
    async function warmUpTechnologiesCache(): Promise<void> {
      try {
        logger.info('Warming up technologies cache...');
    
        // Load all technologies
        await handleListTechnologies(undefined, undefined, true);
    
        // Load popular categories
        const popularCategories = [
          'app-frameworks',
          'graphics-and-games',
          'app-services',
          'system',
        ];
    
        for (const category of popularCategories) {
          await handleListTechnologies(category, undefined, true);
        }
    
        const stats = technologiesCache.getStats();
        logger.info(`Technologies cache warmed up: ${stats.size} entries`);
      } catch (error) {
        logger.error('Failed to warm up technologies cache:', error);
      }
    }
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the bar is lower. The description adds behavioral context like browsing by category, discovering frameworks, and checking beta status, which are helpful but not extensive. It doesn't contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only 4 sentences, front-loaded with the main action, and efficiently covers value and usage cases. Every sentence adds information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with no output schema. The description explains purpose and usage well but could briefly mention the response format (e.g., list of technology names/identifiers). Still, it is largely complete for its complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by mentioning case-sensitivity for category, providing popular examples, and linking parameter use to real tasks (e.g., checking beta status). This goes beyond schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool browses Apple technologies by category, using specific verbs like 'browse' and 'discover'. It distinguishes itself from siblings by mentioning the use case of finding framework identifiers for search_framework_symbols, providing a clear resource and differentiator.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly lists when to use the tool: exploring available frameworks, finding identifiers, and checking beta status. It references search_framework_symbols as a sibling, providing an alternative. However, it lacks explicit when-not-to-use guidance beyond that.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kimsungwhee/apple-docs-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server