Skip to main content
Glama
kimjooyoon

Gooo policy and MCP change checks

by kimjooyoon
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Go
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gooo policy and MCP change checks

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • DingDawg Agent Spend Policy MCP by dingdawg

      DingDawg Agent Spend Policyofficial

      dingdawg
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Deterministically evaluates whether a proposed agent spend action matches a supplied policy, returning ELIGIBLE, DENY, or STEP_UP with stable reason codes. Provides local policy evidence only, not payment authorization.
      1
      28 npm
      MIT

    • BytesJev PlanningChecker

      bennyp11
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to submit their original request, proposed plan items, and observed repository conventions for per-item necessity scoring before making edits. It returns advisory keep, simplify, or review recommendations with reasons and evidence, without blocking or modifying the plan.
      1
      3 npm
      MIT

    • Lodging Decision MCP Server

      Scenic-Stay
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets agents submit a traveler profile, trip context, and candidate listings to receive a deterministic, evidence-backed recommendation with score breakdowns, tradeoffs, risk flags, missing information, and confidence. It handles non-sensitive decision categories only and does not search inventory, book, transact, or persist data.
      MIT

    • Cani

      dmytro-portianka-ddddd
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP client to ask whether a purchase is affordable and receive an auditable, deterministic YES/NO verdict backed by an append-only ledger, and to attempt a real governed checkout that returns a structured decline without creating a PayPal order when the answer is NO. It surfaces committed-payment headroom and essential-lane exceptions so agents can gate spending before money moves.
      8 npm
      MIT

    • Epistemic Warrant Protocol

      koliha
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Helps AI agents decide what they are justified in believing from the evidence they have. EWP separates stored memory from verified knowledge, preserves conflicts and source lineage, and produces a deterministic warrant result that MCP clients can use consistently across different memory systems.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • aethis-mcp by Aethis-ai

      aethis-mcpofficial

      Aethis-ai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables clients to run deterministic eligibility and decision evaluations from compiled legislation, policy, contracts, and regulation, inspect schemas and traces, route next questions, and discover rulesets, with optional private-beta authoring tools for rule generation, testing, refining, and publishing.
      35
      60 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: alias-origin comparison, saved tool-definition comparison, single-request grant assessment, and ordered-list grant assessment. The descriptions explicitly clarify when to use each variant and cross-reference the alternative for closely related grant tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use readable snake_case with a verb-first pattern, such as compare_* and assess_*. The only inconsistency is that the two comparison tools carry a gooo_ prefix while the grant-assessment tools do not.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for a specialized policy/MCP change-checking server. Each tool covers a clear assessment case without redundant variants beyond the necessary single-vs-list distinction.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main advertised checks: alias-origin comparison, saved tool-definition comparison, and service-grant narrowing for both single and ordered requests. It is intentionally assessment-only and snapshot-based, which leaves minor gaps around live validation but is consistent with the stated scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources