A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables Claude, Cursor, or any MCP client to pull an Overleaf project, edit .tex files, check references, compile when a TeX binary is installed, and push changes back.
MIT
mcp-overleaf
by kimhyunji24
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-overleaf
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, edit, upload, compile, and manage projects in a self-hosted Overleaf Community Edition via MCP, while also providing a git remote for cloning and pushing changes.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude and AI agents to read and edit Overleaf documents in real time, with support for project listing, document manipulation, LaTeX compilation, and live collaboration.128 npm41MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to read and edit Overleaf projects live through Overleaf's real-time collaboration channel, so changes reach collaborators instantly and appear in project history. It exposes tools for listing and modifying files, compiling LaTeX with error locations, downloading PDFs, managing folders and uploads, and adding comments or tracked-change suggestions, on overleaf.com or self-hosted instances.18MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects Claude/ChatGPT to Overleaf projects via the Git integration, enabling read, edit, write, and file management through natural language commands.2AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, edit, and compile LaTeX documents in Overleaf projects with tracked changes via the Model Context Protocol.5MIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 17 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Tools mostly target distinct resources and actions, and descriptions clearly separate editing (write_file/create-overwrite, edit_file/string-replace, write_markdown/markdown-conversion). There is mild overlap in the reading cluster (read_file, read_section, get_outline) where a section could be read via read_file, but the descriptions distinguish their intent (whole file, one section by title, structural outline).
Naming Consistency4/5
Names consistently use snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (list_projects, read_file, write_file, add_comment, resolve_comment, download_pdf). Minor deviations exist: retrieval verbs mix list/get/read (list_files, get_outline, read_section) and one tool is a bare verb (compile), but the overall convention is predictable and readable.
Tool Count4/5
17 tools is slightly over the ideal 3-15 band, but each tool covers a distinct operation (listing, reading, editing, file ops, comments, compilation, PDF, language setup) with little redundancy. The surface is well-scoped for the breadth of Overleaf authoring and review workflows rather than inflated.
Completeness4/5
File CRUD/lifecycle (list, read, write, edit, delete, move), the full comment lifecycle (get, add, reply, resolve), and compile/PDF export are covered, giving strong end-to-end support. The notable gap is project-level management: you can list projects but cannot create or delete them, though most agents would handle project creation in the UI.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues