Agent Registry MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Agent Registry MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted governed project memory for coding agents, recording decisions, checkpoints, evidence, review state, and agent activity in PostgreSQL with pgvector while keeping maintainer control over what becomes reusable memory or instruction-grade guidance.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA persistent, trust-scored project memory for AI coding agents, backed by PostgreSQL + pgvector, providing durable memory of architecture decisions, bug patterns, and coding conventions.26 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides persistent project memory for AI coding agents, enabling context retention across sessions via event logging, briefing generation, and querying.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI coding assistants with persistent project memory to retain architectural decisions, code patterns, and domain knowledge across sessions. It stores data locally in a SQLite database, allowing agents to remember, recall, and manage project-specific context using full-text search.8 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents and assistants to share a local-first, token-efficient persistent memory layer across MCP-compatible runtimes, storing typed project facts, decisions, failures, and solutions with temporal validity. It supports offline use and Postgres-compatible storage, so agents can retrieve relevant context without re-embedding entire repositories.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceGives AI coding agents on-demand retrieval of workspace context, documentation, lessons, decisions and handoffs from a five-level (GLOBAL → WORKSPACE → PROJECT → FEATURE → SESSION) store, so they start with a small rule set instead of re-reading bloated docs. Exposes tools for dependency routing, knowledge search, doc reading and health checks backed by a zero-dependency SQLite + FTS5 memory with cross-project sharing of global-scoped knowledge.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Most tools clearly target a distinct resource+action pair (context/skill/project/memory/agent), and parallel search/get operations across resources are reasonably distinguishable. However, skill_resolve versus skill_get is ambiguous without descriptions, and memory_get versus memory_recent plus context_search versus context_get have overlapping retrieval semantics that an agent could easily misselect.
All 15 tools use consistent snake_case with a resource-first, action-second pattern (e.g. context_search, skill_get, memory_register, project_detect). The two *_status tools (registry_status, agent_status) fit the same resource_action convention rather than deviating from it.
15 tools is at the upper end but well-scoped for a registry spanning six resource domains (context, skill, project, memory, registry, agent), with roughly 2-3 tools per domain and no obvious redundancy.
The surface covers registration, lookup, and search for some resources, and memory has a full lifecycle including memory_transition. But there is no skill_register, no context_register, no update/delete operations for projects or contexts, and agent support is limited to a single status tool, leaving notable lifecycle gaps.