Skip to main content
Glama
@kieksme/listmonk-mcp

@kieksme/listmonk-mcp

by kieksme

Get Template

listmonk_get_template
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a single Listmonk template by numeric ID, including its full HTML body, to inspect or reuse template content.

Instructions

Retrieves a single template by id, including its full HTML body.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "listmonk_get_template"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesNumeric id.
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' for human-readable text (default) or 'json' for machine-readable data.markdown

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.3.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive and open-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description contributes one genuinely useful behavioral detail beyond that: the response includes the full HTML body, not just metadata. It says nothing about behavior when the id does not exist or about response size.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One compact sentence, front-loaded with the action and resource, with the HTML-body detail tacked on where it matters. Nothing is wasted, though it is so short that it leaves gaps rather than being optimally informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter read tool with a fully documented schema and read-only annotations, the description covers what is fetched and that the HTML body is included. No output schema exists, so a brief note on the return shape is present; missing only edge-case behavior for unknown ids.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters are documented in the schema, including the response_format enum and default. The description only restates that lookup is by id, adding no format, range, or fallback semantics beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Retrieves a single template by id') and scopes it to one record including the HTML body, which distinguishes it implicitly from listmonk_list_templates and the preview tools. It stops short of naming a sibling explicitly, so it falls just under the top band.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: an agent can infer 'use this to fetch one template's content' as opposed to listmonk_list_templates (enumerate) or listmonk_preview_template (render). There is no explicit when-not, no note on preferring preview for rendered output, and no guidance on error behavior for a missing id.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools