Publish Post
publish_postPublish a draft WordPress post: provide its ID to make it live immediately.
Instructions
Publish a draft post to WordPress (make it live).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| postId | Yes | The post ID to publish |
publish_postPublish a draft WordPress post: provide its ID to make it live immediately.
Publish a draft post to WordPress (make it live).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| postId | Yes | The post ID to publish |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. The description adds 'make it live', which is consistent. No additional behavioral traits (e.g., side effects, permissions) are disclosed, but given annotation coverage, the description meets the baseline.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the action and outcome. No unnecessary words or redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With one parameter, no output schema, and adequate annotations, the description is mostly complete. It lacks details on what happens if the post is already published or the return value, but these are minor given the simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds context that the postId refers to a 'draft post', which clarifies the expected state beyond the schema description 'The post ID to publish'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool publishes a draft post, making it live. The verb 'publish' and resource 'draft post' are specific. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling 'direct_publish', which could cause confusion about when to use each.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for draft posts but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'direct_publish' or 'update_post'. No when-not-to-use or context for choosing among siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kfuras/notipo-app'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server