Skip to main content
Glama
kezhu-ai

UBA MCP Server

by kezhu-ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to UBA MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Browser Agents MCP

      sankalpsinghcoder-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control a real web browser through 42 MCP tools for navigation, clicking, typing, forms, file handling, data extraction, CAPTCHA solving, and browser sessions. It also supports multi-agent isolation, persistent profiles, identity vaults, and agent-to-agent messaging.
      MIT

    • Real Browser MCP

      qxZap
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a real browser that bypasses bot detection (Cloudflare, Turnstile) for AI agents, enabling navigation, clicking, typing, screenshots, and data collection through MCP tools.
      354 npm
      MIT

    • open-use

      wyatt-liao
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate both web browsers and native desktop applications through a unified interface, supporting tasks like browsing, clicking, typing, and file clipboard operations via exposed MCP tools.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • Reasonix Browser Bridge

      liutingqiu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Browser automation for AI agents: tabs, cookies, arbitrary JS execution (via CDP, bypasses CSP), screenshots, downloads, proxy switching, data cleanup. Chrome & Edge multi-browser, full permissions, zero configuration. 25+ MCP tools.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one navigates to a URL, the other clicks elements based on references. No ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent browse_verb_noun pattern (browse_navigate, browse_click), maintaining good naming uniformity.

    Tool Count2/5

    Only 2 tools for a web browsing server is too few. Typical browsing automation requires additional tools for extracting content, inputting data, or scrolling.

    Completeness1/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for web browsing. Missing essential operations like getting page content, filling forms, or executing other interactions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources