health_check
Checks the operational status of the Keyshade API to confirm it is functioning correctly.
Instructions
Check if the Keyshade API is healthy
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Checks the operational status of the Keyshade API to confirm it is functioning correctly.
Check if the Keyshade API is healthy
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description 'check if the Keyshade API is healthy' fully discloses the tool's behavior. Since there are no annotations, the description carries the burden, and it accurately describes a read-only health check with no side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, zero waste. Perfectly concise for the simple functionality.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is complete. It adequately describes the tool's purpose and behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline of 4 applies. Description does not need to add parameter information.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool checks the Keyshade API health. Verb 'Check' and resource 'Keyshade API health' are specific and distinct from sibling tools which are CRUD operations on various resources.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While health check tools are typically used before other operations to verify service availability, the description does not provide this context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/keyshade-xyz/keyshade-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server