list_assets
Retrieve a list of uploaded assets, with a configurable limit from 1 to 1000, to use in AI generation tasks.
Instructions
List uploaded assets
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Max assets to return (1-1000) |
Retrieve a list of uploaded assets, with a configurable limit from 1 to 1000, to use in AI generation tasks.
List uploaded assets
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | Max assets to return (1-1000) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as pagination, ordering, or whether all assets are listed. The description carries the full burden but is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise with a single sentence. It is not bloated, but could benefit from slight expansion while remaining efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity (1 param, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It does not mention what the returned data looks like, or any limitations (e.g., max return count).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (limit parameter documented). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List uploaded assets' clearly states the verb and resource, but is very brief. It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_asset' and 'upload_asset' only through context, not explicitly.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidelines on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_asset' for a single asset. No context about expected use cases or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/keugenek/krea-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server