test_retrieve_block

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavior. It only states 'Get block information', which implies a read operation but does not explicitly confirm no side effects, destructive actions, or any other behavioral traits beyond the basic retrieval.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and direct, which is concise, but it lacks essential details such as parameter context or usage hints. It is not overly verbose, but the brevity comes at the cost of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Considering the single parameter, no annotations, and the presence of an output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what 'block information' includes, any prerequisites, or how the tool fits into the broader API workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% parameter description coverage, and the description does not add any meaning to the single 'block_id' parameter beyond its name. No format, source, or constraints are mentioned, limiting the agent's understanding of how to use the parameter correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb 'Get' and specifies 'block information', which indicates the tool retrieves block details. However, it does not differentiate this test version from the non-test sibling 'default_retrieve_block', missing an opportunity to clarify the context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It simply states the function without any context, exclusions, or comparison to sibling tools like 'default_retrieve_block' or other retrieval tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.