remove_tracks_from_playlist

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds nothing beyond the annotations: no mention of irreversibility, permission requirements, or the 'my playlist' ownership constraint stated as a real limitation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no waste and the action front-loaded. But it is under-specified rather than genuinely concise, since brevity comes at the cost of any useful detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A destructive mutation tool with an output schema (no return-value explanation needed) but zero parameter documentation and no usage context. An agent cannot determine what 'kind' means or when this tool should be preferred, so the definition is incomplete for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and neither parameter is explained. 'Kind' (an integer) is completely opaque, and 'track_ids' is only vaguely implied by 'указанные треки'. The description fails to compensate for the coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Удаляет указанные треки из моего плейлиста' = removes specified tracks from my playlist), which is clearly distinct from the sibling add_tracks_to_playlist. However, it does not explicitly reference siblings or delimit itself beyond the verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus alternatives such as add_tracks_to_playlist, nor any prerequisites (e.g., ownership of the playlist). The description only restates the operation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.