close_capture
Close the currently open GPU frame capture in RenderDoc to free resources and prepare for new captures.
Instructions
关闭当前 capture。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Close the currently open GPU frame capture in RenderDoc to free resources and prepare for new captures.
关闭当前 capture。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description does not disclose what happens when closing the capture (e.g., discarding, saving, or side effects). With no annotations, this lack of behavioral context reduces transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence. While efficient, it could benefit from a slightly more structured format (e.g., stating the effect concisely).
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description should provide more context about the tool's behavior. It is too minimal to be fully informative.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond stating the action, which is baseline adequate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action: close the current capture. It uses a specific verb and resource, and the name aligns with sibling 'open_capture', providing implicit differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage context or prerequisites are provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'open_capture' or other sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/kenzo1024/RenderdocMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server