A
licenseNot graded
qualityF
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables advanced task and project management in Todoist via Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients.
195 npm
2
MIT
MCP Todoist
by kentaroh7777
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Todoist
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Python MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage Todoist tasks and projects through the Model Context Protocol. It supports full CRUD operations for tasks and projects, including support for nested projects and Todoist's advanced filter syntax.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for the Todoist API. Provides full access to tasks, projects, labels, sections, and comments with support for all task properties including priorities, due dates, labels, subtasks, and more.195 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceConnect AI agents to your Todoist tasks via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).281MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with the Todoist REST API v2 to enable AI assistants to manage tasks, projects, sections, comments, and labels. It supports comprehensive operations including batch task creation, history tracking for completed tasks, and organized project management.33290 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA clean, reliable MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for Todoist — built on the Todoist unified API v1.201MIT
TDQS
B3/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation2/5
There is significant overlap and confusion between 'add-task-to-any-project' and 'add-task-to-project'—they appear to serve nearly identical purposes, with only subtle differences in wording that could easily lead to misselection. The other tools are more distinct but the core task-adding functionality is ambiguous.
Naming Consistency4/5
The naming follows a consistent kebab-case pattern (e.g., 'add-task-to-any-project', 'get-projects') throughout all tools, which is predictable and readable. There are no deviations in style, though the specific verb choices could be more standardized.
Tool Count4/5
With 5 tools, the count is reasonable for a Todoist integration, covering core operations like adding tasks and retrieving projects/tasks. It's slightly thin but manageable for basic functionality without feeling overloaded.
Completeness2/5
The toolset has significant gaps for a Todoist domain: it lacks update or delete operations for tasks or projects, and there is no way to manage task completion or priorities. This incomplete coverage will likely cause agent failures in common workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues