A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA MCP server that enables AI assistants to collect interactive user feedback with text and image support via a modern GUI.
234
MIT
MCP Feedback Collector
by keizman
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Feedback Collector
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that establishes feedback-oriented development workflows with a Web UI and desktop app, allowing users to provide interactive feedback to AI models through prompts, images, and session tracking.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that enables AI assistants to collect interactive user feedback via a browser window with full Markdown rendering and syntax highlighting.11613MIT
- -licenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to request user feedback at critical points during interactions, improving communication and reducing unnecessary tool calls.13-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn advanced MCP server that provides interactive feedback mechanisms with support for various feedback types, multi-language capabilities, and team collaboration features for AI tools like Cursor, Cline, and Windsurf.41MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA powerful MCP server that provides interactive user feedback and command execution capabilities for AI-assisted development, featuring a graphical interface with text and image support.144MIT
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation3/5
The three tools have distinct primary purposes—collecting feedback, getting image info, and picking an image—but there is some overlap between get_image_info and pick_image since both handle images. An agent might occasionally misselect between them when the task involves image processing, though their descriptions clarify the difference.
Naming Consistency4/5
The tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (collect_feedback, get_image_info, pick_image), which is clear and predictable. There are no deviations in naming style, making it easy for an agent to parse and understand the tool functions.
Tool Count3/5
With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for a 'Feedback Collector' domain, as it lacks tools for managing or analyzing feedback (e.g., list_feedback, delete_feedback). However, the tools cover basic collection and image handling, so it's borderline but not severely lacking.
Completeness2/5
The server is incomplete for its stated purpose of collecting feedback. It provides tools to collect and handle images but lacks essential operations like storing, retrieving, or summarizing feedback. This creates significant gaps that could cause agent failures in feedback management workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues