Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to shutter-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local image manager MCP server for Windows, enabling AI assistants to search, preview, tag, favorite, and sync local images while keeping originals read-only.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search, filter, and manage a private local photo library with CLIP-based text and similarity search, EXIF/GPS metadata, duplicate detection, albums, and folder indexing, returning ranked results and optional contact sheets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets LLMs read and edit image metadata (EXIF, GPS, XMP, ICC, IPTC, and more) entirely offline. Supports files, URLs, base64, and includes a browser-based UI for analysis, GPS extraction, and metadata stripping.
      13
      BSD 2-Clause "Simplified"
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Immich self-hosted photo management that provides AI-accessible tools for browsing, searching, organizing, and managing photo libraries with duplicate detection and safe deletion workflows.
      43
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run cross-platform batch photo-processing workflows—including RAW decoding, adjustments, noise reduction, white balance, LOG restoration, EXIF tagging, deduplication, selection, HTML galleries, folder watching, and presets—through a unified versioned JSON contract. It also exposes MCP tools for processing, suggestions, autopilot, indexing, search, selection, HDR, face blurring, and more.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct level of analysis: whole-library scanning, EXIF aggregation, single-file EXIF, duplicate detection, blur scoring, and a combined report. Descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other with 'use X instead' notes, leaving no realistic chance of misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use consistent snake_case, which is the important part. Most are verb_noun or clear noun_phrase (scan_library, read_exif, find_duplicates), though library_stats, blur_scores, and cull_report are noun-first, a minor stylistic deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well scoped for a photo-library analysis server. Each tool earns its place, and the composite cull_report cleanly wraps the primitives without duplicating their interfaces.

    Completeness4/5

    The analysis surface is strong: scanning, metadata aggregation, per-file inspection, deduplication, blur detection, and a report. Minor gaps remain for a culling workflow — no way to flag, move, or delete rejected files, and blur scoring is jpg-only — but these are acknowledged limitations rather than dead ends for the stated read-only purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues