Skip to main content
Glama
keithdev21

business-central-mcp

by keithdev21

bc_execute_action

Executes named actions or cue-tile drill-downs on Business Central pages, enabling row-specific operations and list navigation from Role Centers.

Instructions

Executes either a named action OR a cue-tile drill-down on an open page. Pass action for header / line / system actions (Post, Delete, New, Release). Pass cue for Role Center cue tiles to open the underlying list (e.g. cue: "Sales Quotes" with section: "subpage:Activities" opens the Sales Quotes list). Requires a pageContextId from bc_open_page.

For cue drill-down, also pass section pointing at the subpage that owns the cuegroup. The returned openedPages array contains the targetPageContextId of the newly-opened list page.

For a named action: validates the action is enabled, sends the InvokeAction RPC, applies the resulting events, and returns updatedFields / changedSections / dialogsOpened / openedPages.

Use exactly one of "action" or "cue" -- passing both is an error.

If the action triggers a confirmation dialog or modal page, the response includes a dialogsOpened array with the dialog's formId and details. When requiresDialogResponse is true, you must follow up with bc_respond_dialog to confirm or cancel.

Row-scoped actions (Delete, Edit on a list row) require targeting a specific row. Use rowIndex (0-based) or bookmark to specify which row the action applies to. For Document pages, use section to disambiguate between header and line actions (e.g., "Delete" on header deletes the whole document, "Delete" on "lines" deletes one line).

Pass expectedStateVersion (from a prior bc_read_data or bc_open_page stateVersion field) to guard against acting on drifted state. If the page has been mutated by async events or a sibling operation since that read, the call is immediately rejected with code STALE_CONTEXT before touching BC. Re-read with bc_read_data to get the current stateVersion, then retry. Omit expectedStateVersion to skip the check.

Do NOT use this for writing field values -- use bc_write_data. Do NOT use this to open records from a list -- use bc_navigate with drill_down action instead.

Examples:

  • Drill into a cue tile: { "pageContextId": "rc1", "section": "subpage:Activities", "cue": "Sales Quotes" }

  • Post a sales order: { "pageContextId": "so1", "action": "Post" }

  • Delete a row: { "pageContextId": "list1", "action": "Delete", "bookmark": "..." }

  • Create new record: { "pageContextId": "abc", "action": "New" }

  • Delete a document line: { "pageContextId": "abc", "action": "Delete", "section": "lines", "rowIndex": 2 }

  • Execute with staleness guard: { "pageContextId": "abc", "action": "Post", "expectedStateVersion": 5 }

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cueNoCue tile name to drill down on (e.g. "Sales Quotes", "Pending Approvals"). Use with section pointing at the subpage that owns the cuegroup. Use action OR cue, not both.
actionNoAction caption name to execute (case-insensitive). Use action OR cue, not both. Must match a visible, enabled action from bc_open_page response.
sectionNoSection context. Required when using cue; optional for action. Examples: "lines", "subpage:Activities".
bookmarkNoStable row identifier for row-scoped actions.
rowIndexNo0-based row position for row-scoped actions.
pageContextIdYesPage context ID returned by bc_open_page.
expectedStateVersionNoOpt-in staleness guard. Pass the stateVersion from a prior bc_read_data or bc_open_page response. If the page state has changed since that read (async events or sibling writes mutated it), the call is rejected immediately with code STALE_CONTEXT before touching BC. Omit to skip the check.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description fully carries the behavioral burden. It details the invocation flow (validates action enabled, sends InvokeAction RPC, applies events), explains returned fields (updatedFields, changedSections, dialogsOpened, openedPages), and discloses the STALE_CONTEXT rejection semantics. It even covers confirmation dialogs and the follow-up bc_respond_dialog requirement. No contradiction with annotations (none present).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but well-structured with short thematic paragraphs. Every sentence carries meaningful information, but some redundancy exists (e.g., repeated mentions of action OR cue exclusivity across schema and text). It is appropriately sized for the tool's complexity, though it could be tightened slightly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (7 parameters, two modes, no output schema), the description is exceptionally complete. It covers prerequisites, row-scoping nuances, dialog handling, staleness checks, and return values. The examples illustrate typical use cases, making this a model description for a complex action executor.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, the description significantly enriches parameter meanings. It clarifies that section is required for cue but optional for action, distinguishes rowIndex vs bookmark for row-scoped actions, and explains the expectedStateVersion guard with a concrete error code. The multiple examples tie parameters to real scenarios, exceeding the schema's basic descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb+resource: "Executes either a named action OR a cue-tile drill-down on an open page." It clearly distinguishes the two modes and names sibling alternatives (bc_write_data, bc_navigate) in the "Do NOT use" section, leaving no ambiguity about scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use guidance: actions for header/line/system actions, cue for Role Center cue tiles. It also states exclusions: "Do NOT use this for writing field values -- use bc_write_data" and "Do NOT use this to open records from a list -- use bc_navigate with drill_down action instead." Additionally, it requires pageContextId from bc_open_page and explains when to pass section, rowIndex, bookmark, and expectedStateVersion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/keithdev21/Business-Central-Mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server