tenth_man_configure

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description alone must disclose behavioral traits. While it lists configuration goals, it omits important details such as whether changes persist, require restart, or affect ongoing operations. The description is insufficient for a configuration tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no wasted words. It front-loads the purpose and provides a useful auto-detection note. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description covers the essential configuration aspects. It explains what can be configured and mentions auto-detection. It could mention return value or persistence, but for a lightweight configuration tool it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with each parameter having a clear description. The tool description maps parameters to categories ('preferences, timeouts, trigger patterns'), adding context but not significant new meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Configure agent preferences, timeouts, and trigger patterns for the 10th Man Protocol.' It uses a specific verb ('configure') and resource ('10th Man Protocol settings'), clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like 'tenth_man_history' and 'tenth_man_review'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when changing settings, but does not provide explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, nor does it mention alternatives. The line 'Auto-detects available CLI agents if not specified' offers some context but no formal guidelines.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.