Skip to main content
Glama
kedro-org

Kedro MCP Server

Official
by kedro-org
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Kedro MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • flyte-mcp

      atoolz
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with accurate Flyte V2 knowledge, patterns, and plugin information to help developers write correct Flyte code. It enables tasks like learning the V2 API, finding examples, selecting plugins, and migrating V1 code to V2.
      17
      Apache 2.0

    • CastPlan MCP

      Ghostseller
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with persistent memory of your project architecture, development history, and technical decisions, allowing them to give context-aware coding help without needing repeated explanations.
      16
      61 npm
      2
      MIT

    • RulesetMCP

      n8daniels
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with queryable, version-controlled project rules and coding standards. Enables validation, rule-based guidance, and task summaries to keep AI work aligned with your project's conventions without repeating context.
      2
      MIT

    • CodeSavant

      twolven
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides code manipulation, execution, and version control capabilities. It allows AI assistants to read, write, and execute code while maintaining a history of changes.
      9
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool clearly targets a distinct area: general usage, notebook conversion, and project migration. There is no overlap in their described purposes, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are readable but follow different conventions: 'kedro_general_instructions' uses a prefix, 'notebook_to_kedro' uses an arrow-style descriptor, and 'project_migration' is a plain noun phrase. The lack of a uniform pattern is noticeable.

    Tool Count4/5

    The server is narrowly scoped to providing instructions, and three tools cover its intended sub-areas. While not excessive, the set is minimal and could benefit from a few more topics to feel more complete.

    Completeness2/5

    The domain is Kedro, yet the tool surface covers only general guidance, notebook conversion, and project migration. Missing are tools for pipeline development, data catalog management, or execution, which are core Kedro workflows. This leaves significant gaps for agents needing practical help.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources