db_get_operation_log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states that it returns data, but does not mention any behavioral traits such as idempotency, authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects. The implicit read-only nature is not explicitly confirmed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with three sentences and a parameter list. It front-loads the purpose and immediately follows with prerequisite guidance. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (which describes return values), the description covers the essential purpose and usage. It does not elaborate on constraints (e.g., required state of the operation) but is sufficient for an experienced user.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description adds meaning to both parameters: backup_id is 'Numeric ID of the backup job' and operation_id is 'Numeric ID of the operation (from db_list_operations).' This clarifies their source and format, though the schema types are strings.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the purpose: 'Return the detailed log and result statistics for a specific operation.' It uses a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes itself from siblings by focusing on log and result details for a single operation, referencing db_list_operations for finding operation IDs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear usage instruction: 'Use db_list_operations to find operation IDs.' This tells the agent when to use this tool relative to a sibling. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or give alternative tools for similar tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.