F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA highly configurable, deployment-ready MCP server with modular architecture for dynamic tool loading and external package support.
1
-
my-mcp
by kcbabo
Related Servers
Alternatives to my-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA flexible, extensible framework for building MCP servers with API key authentication, user management, and dynamic tool sharing.4 npm11MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA production-ready, modular MCP server with 40+ tools across 8 categories, featuring dynamic auto-loading and sandboxed security for file system, database, and network operations.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA modular and extensible tool server built on FastMCP that supports multiple tools organized across files and communicates via MCP protocol.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA framework for building MCP servers with standardized tools, authentication, logging, and multiple transports. Enables rapid development of secure, auditable MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server framework enabling standardized tool registration, discovery, and invocation over JSON-RPC 2.0, with support for InProcess, SSE, and WebSocket transports, plus built-in tools such as calculator, text processor, and JSON formatter.MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 11 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have distinct purposes focused on demonstrating different MCP capabilities, with clear boundaries between them. However, 'annotatedMessage' and 'structuredContent' both demonstrate response formatting, which could cause some confusion about which to use for structured output scenarios.
Naming Consistency2/5
The naming is inconsistent with mixed conventions: 'annotatedMessage' uses camelCase while most others use snake_case. There's also inconsistency in verb usage - some start with verbs (get, list, print, start), others are nouns (echo, sum), and some are descriptive phrases (longRunningOperation).
Tool Count5/5
With 11 tools, this is well-scoped for a demonstration server covering various MCP features. Each tool serves a distinct demonstration purpose, and the count feels appropriate for showing the breadth of MCP capabilities without being overwhelming.
Completeness4/5
For a demonstration server, it covers most key MCP features well: annotations, resources, images, roots, operations, environment, LLM sampling, elicitation, structured content, and basic operations. The main gap is the lack of a tool demonstrating MCP prompts, but otherwise it's quite comprehensive for its purpose.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues