Aspro Cloud MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Aspro Cloud MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables LLMs to interact with the Aspro.Cloud REST API through self-describing tools for discovering and calling modules, entities, and methods.720 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with amoCRM, providing access to deals, contacts, companies, notes, tasks, and custom fields via natural language.6 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to autonomously interact with Kommo CRM, providing tools for managing pipelines, leads, contacts, and custom fields via the Kommo API v4.271-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Bitrix24 CRM for managing contacts, deals, tasks, and leads via a comprehensive set of tools. It supports advanced features like sales team monitoring, performance analytics, and automated CRM searching.-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables users to manage Pipedrive CRM data including deals, contacts, and activities directly through an AI assistant. It supports full CRUD operations, email engagement analysis, and mapping of custom field metadata for comprehensive pipeline management.123135 npm8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with the Pipedrive CRM to manage deals, contacts, organizations, and activities. It features automatic custom field synchronization and guided onboarding to ensure assistants follow specific business rules and pipelines.37 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Tools cleanly separate into leads, tasks, workflow/pipeline configuration, and users. Each tool targets a unique resource-action pair, such as list_pipelines versus list_pipeline_stages, so there is no real ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (list_*, get_*, create_*, update_*, delete_*, search_*). This makes the toolset predictable and easy to navigate.
At 16 tools, the server is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range but still well-scoped. The count is justified by covering two major domains (leads and tasks) plus user lookup, with minimal redundancy.
Both leads and tasks have full CRUD coverage, complemented by pipeline/stage and workflow/stage listing. Minor gaps exist, such as no user listing (only search) and no CRUD for pipelines/workflows, but these are typically configuration-level and do not block core workflows.