Skip to main content
Glama
kassol

mcp-searxng

by kassol
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-searxng

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SearXNG MCP Server

      benreichman
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web search and content scraping from multiple engines via a local SearXNG instance, allowing AI assistants to retrieve and extract web content.
      1
      -

    • SearXNG MCP Server

      ngc-shj
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables web search, image search, and news search through a self-hosted SearXNG instance. Provides privacy-focused meta-search capabilities aggregating results from multiple search engines.
      3
      1
      MIT

    • WebFetch.MCP

      manooll
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local LLMs to search the web and fetch clean content from URLs without API keys, using SearxNG and Mozilla Readability.
      2
      36
      MIT

    • SearXNG MCP Server

      The-AI-Workshops
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform privacy-respecting web searches through SearXNG, with support for multiple search engines, categories, and advanced filtering options.
      25
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct role: one performs web searches and the other reads specific URLs. There is no overlap in functionality, making them easy to distinguish.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The naming pattern is inconsistent: one tool uses the 'searxng_' prefix while the other does not, and the action-object order differs (web_search vs url_read). This mixed convention could confuse an agent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels minimal and is below the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. However, the two tools do cover a basic search-and-read workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The pair covers the core search and content retrieval workflow, which is sufficient for basic information gathering. Minor gaps exist, such as no advanced search options, but these are not critical for a simple search server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources