get_routine_folders
Retrieves a paginated list of routine folders from your Hevy workout data.
Instructions
Get a list of routine folders
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | ||
| pageSize | No |
Retrieves a paginated list of routine folders from your Hevy workout data.
Get a list of routine folders
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | ||
| pageSize | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must carry full burden. It only states 'get a list' which implies read-only, but doesn't disclose pagination behavior, sorting, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, but too terse to convey necessary detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With two parameters, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description lacks detail on pagination, return format, and differentiation from similar tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not mention the 'page' or 'pageSize' parameters, offering no added meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a list of routine folders' clearly states the verb (Get) and resource (list of routine folders) and distinguishes from sibling 'get_routine_folder' which retrieves a single folder.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like get_routine_folder or get_routines. Pagination context is implied by parameters but not explained.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/karlhsueh/hevyapp-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server