Skip to main content
Glama
kardashev-lab

kardashev-mcp

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to kardashev-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Open-source MCP servers exposing US solar data (production, resource, economics, market, forecast) as agent-accessible tools with a consistent data envelope.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      One-call Australian energy-market plumbing via AEMO — cited, structured responses for market data and analysis, not a data broker.
      5
      140 PyPI
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes European day-ahead electricity prices for ~41 bidding zones via tools like hourly prices, cheapest hours, current price, and cross-zone summary, enabling AI agents to query energy market data.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for real-time electricity prices, carbon intensity, and energy analytics across 41+ zones in Europe, Great Britain, the United States, and Australia. Query live prices, compare zones, check gas storage levels, get green scores, find optimal charging windows, and access advanced analytics. Free Basic tier requires no API key. Install via npx gridpulse-mcp or connect directly via Streamab
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      DC Hub is the live Model Context Protocol layer for data-center and energy infrastructure. AI agents call 91 tools across 22,900+ facilities for land+power, grid, interconnection, fiber, and Capacity Source — with as_of timestamps. Connect: https://dchub.cloud/connect · Docs: https://dchub.cloud/ai-agents · Endpoint: https://dchub.cloud/mcp · Pro $99/mo (never $299/Founding).
      91
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct data type or service. Potential overlaps like get_lmp vs get_spread_forecast or get_queue vs get_large_load are clearly differentiated by descriptions, leaving little ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority follow a get_<noun> pattern with clear, descriptive nouns. One exception is list_isos, which uses 'list' instead of 'get', but this is a minor deviation and the set remains highly consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the server covers a broad energy-domain surface without excessive fragmentation. Each tool appears necessary for a distinct type of grid data, fitting well within the typical well-scoped range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides a comprehensive view of ISO load, generation, pricing, emissions, curtailment, and interconnection queues, plus specialized forecasts and track records. Minor gaps like a dedicated wind/solar forecast or historical load export exist, but core workflows are fully supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues