confluence_update_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states it finds and sets state, but does not disclose side effects, permissions required, or behavior if task is not found. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a clear docstring format. However, the first line says 'Toggle' while the behavior is 'sets its state', causing minor inconsistency. Overall no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema or annotations. The description covers purpose and parameters but lacks return value specification, error handling behavior (e.g., task not found), and assumptions about page existence. Adequate for a simple tool but incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has no descriptions (0% coverage), but the description adds significant value: page_id accepts numeric ID or URL, task_text is a substring match, and state valid values are 'DONE' or 'TODO'. All parameters are explained clearly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool toggles (sets) a task checkbox on a Confluence page, specifying the verb 'Toggle' and the resource 'task item'. It distinguishes from siblings like confluence_edit_page by focusing on task state changes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains how to use the tool (provide page_id, task_text, state) but does not mention when to use it versus alternatives like confluence_edit_page or when not to use it. There is no guidance on prerequisites or fallbacks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.