get-lists
Search for bookmarks matching a specific query and retrieve the corresponding lists.
Instructions
Search for bookmarks matching a specific a query.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Search for bookmarks matching a specific query and retrieve the corresponding lists.
Search for bookmarks matching a specific a query.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It claims to search bookmarks with a query but the input schema has zero parameters, making the actual behavior unclear or contradictory.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short, but it sacrifices clarity for brevity. It fails to convey essential information, making it under-specified rather than concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and a misleading description, the tool definition is severely incomplete. Important details about behavior, parameters, and outputs are missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description mentions 'matching a specific query' but the input schema defines no parameters. This creates a critical mismatch; the description adds no useful meaning and actually misleads.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description says 'Search for bookmarks' but the tool name is 'get-lists', creating a clear mismatch. It fails to state what the tool actually does and does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'search-bookmarks' or 'get-bookmarks-in-list'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'search-bookmarks' or 'get-bookmarks-in-list'. The agent lacks context for tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/karakeep-app/karakeep'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server