Skip to main content
Glama
kao273183
by kao273183

Related Servers

Alternatives to mk-spec-master

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Keyless, local MCP server bringing ISTQB / OWASP / IEEE / ISO / EU AI Act QA standards into your AI client. Standards-grounded retrieval, deterministic QA effort estimation, automated QA document quality review (0-100 rubric), and JUnit/CSV test-results flakiness analysis.
      6
      265 PyPI
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      QA Sphere MCP server that enables Large Language Models to interact directly with test management system test cases, supporting AI-powered development workflows and test case discovery.
      15
      55 npm
      23
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An AI-native specification framework that enables deep requirements analysis and structured project planning through intelligent Q\&A workflows. The MCP server provides tools for project initialization, requirement analysis, and the generation of living documentation like development plans and architecture specs.
      2 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for API test case generation from Swagger/OpenAPI specs. Parses Swagger 2.0 and OpenAPI 3.x, generates test cases across 8 categories (positive, negative, boundary, auth, security, idempotency, pagination, business logic), and exports to Postman, TestRail, Allure, k6, pytest, Gherkin, and CSV. Supports internal corporate APIs with auth headers. Auto-saves export files to your working di
      10
      9 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, covering separate phases of the spec lifecycle (fetching, parsing, quality analysis, test generation, linking, coverage, drift, history, etc.). No two tools perform overlapping functions; related tools like analyze_spec_quality and propose_spec_improvements are designed to work sequentially without ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., fetch_spec, parse_spec, get_coverage_matrix). There are no deviations or mixed naming conventions, making the API predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 18 tools, the server covers the full spec management process without bloat. Each tool serves a unique and necessary function, and the count is well-scoped for the domain—neither too few to be useful nor too many to be overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core lifecycle: listing, fetching, parsing, quality analysis, test generation, linking (manual and auto), coverage, drift detection, optimization, history, context, source info, and telemetry. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool for unlinking tests from specs or editing the spec-knowledge file, but these do not severely hinder typical workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive