Skip to main content
Glama
kansei-link

KanseiLink MCP Server

by kansei-link
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to KanseiLink MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SecureMCP Agent Hub

      sgt-9304
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely call enterprise MCP tools with tenant-scoped RBAC, human approvals, audit logging, and multi-tool workflows across customer, order, document, and ticket data.
      -

    • disvr

      Svanik-yan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Tool search engine for AI agents. One API call to discover the best MCP server for any task. 900+ services indexed with 4-dimensional value ranking.
      MIT

    • Relay

      adarshp14
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access a unified catalog of tools from various APIs (OpenAPI, GraphQL, MCP, Google Discovery) through the MCP protocol.
      MIT
    • SandBase by sandbaseai

      SandBaseofficial

      sandbaseai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to discover and invoke 2,000+ models and APIs—including web search, social media, scraping, image/video generation, and audio—through a single local MCP bridge using OAuth, with no per-API keys.
      32 npm
      188
      Apache 2.0

    • fastrack

      aabxtract
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables plain-English workflow automation across connected tools like GitHub, Notion, Slack, and more, with self-healing execution, scheduling, and status reporting through MCP.
      3 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: search_services for finding services, lookup for service details, report for submitting feedback, analyze for generating analytics, and inspect for admin tasks. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names are all lowercase and use underscores, but they mix single-word verbs (analyze, inspect, lookup, report) with a verb-noun compound (search_services). This inconsistency in pattern could be confusing, though each name is still descriptive.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for the server's purpose: search, detail lookup, feedback, analytics, and admin. Each tool earns its place and the count is neither too few nor too many.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the entire advertised workflow (search_services → lookup → report) plus analytics and admin capabilities. There are no obvious gaps; inspect even includes proposal management for updates.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources