Skip to main content
Glama
kami-sqmf

Human Input MCP

by kami-sqmf
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Human Input MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • windows-computer-use-mcp

      hiphopanda
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides desktop automation tools for Windows, enabling mouse and keyboard control, screenshots, clipboard management, and application interaction via the MCP protocol.
      43 npm
      MIT

    • codex-cua-mcp

      osamabinabsar
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP agents to drive Windows applications by targeting individual windows—clicking, typing, scrolling, dragging, and reading accessibility trees or screenshots—without stealing the user's focus, mouse, or keyboard. Runs entirely locally alongside the user, with per-app approval and no cloud account or usage limits.
      MIT

    • Computer-Controller-Bridg

      Dobona
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients on Windows to control the local mouse, keyboard, and screen understanding via MCP stdio, allowing automated workflows like viewing the screen, locating elements, clicking, typing, and verifying results.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • atomic-computer-mcp

      Dawdler-G
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables automation of native Windows desktop applications through screen capture, mouse/keyboard control, and waiting for UI changes, exposing them as MCP tools.
      1
      -

    • windows-computer-use-mcp

      KonnectSuite
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to control Windows desktop applications through UI Automation and Win32, supporting window management, mouse/keyboard input, element inspection, screenshots, OCR, macro recording, and autonomous multi-app missions. It also provides an HTTP/stdio MCP interface, an operator UI, and optional telemetry and safety controls.
      MIT

    • OmniFlow

      huppugo1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to automate Windows desktop applications through window manipulation, image recognition, OCR, keyboard/mouse simulation, and memory operations via the MCP protocol.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 30 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools are grouped into human input, reading, and timer domains, and descriptions clarify many boundaries. However, several similar safety/status/cancel tools exist (human_stop, human_pause, human_mode, human_status, reading_cancel, timer_invalidate/detach), and input tools like human_activate, human_mouse_click, human_key, and human_type could still be confused without careful reading.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names use consistent snake_case and clear domain prefixes: human_, reading_, and timer_. Most follow prefix_action or prefix_noun patterns, with minor deviations such as human_key and human_capabilities.

    Tool Count2/5

    Thirty tools is heavy for this server, even accounting for the safety, reading, and timer subdomains. The surface feels over-granular, with many specialized status, cancellation, and timer tools that could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core human-input lifecycle: observation, targeting, pointer and keyboard actions, pause/resume/stop, event history, reading traversal, and timer coordination. Some gaps remain, such as no explicit right-click/double-click or window-focus tool, but those may be intentionally out of scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources